Article
Details
Citation
Myrseth KOR & Wollbrant CE (2013) A theory of self-control and na?veté: The blights of willpower and blessings of temptation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, pp. 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.003
Abstract
We model self-control conflict as an agent's stochastic struggle against a visceral influence that impels the agent to act sub-optimally. The agent holds costly pre-commitment technology to avoid the conflict altogether and may decide whether to procure pre-commitment or to confront the visceral influence. We examine na?ve expectations for the strength of the visceral influence; na?ve expectations lead the agent to exaggerate the expected utility of resisting temptation and so mistakenly forego pre-commitment. Contrary to accepted wisdom, our analysis reveals conditions under which higher will-power—and lower visceral influence—reduces welfare. Our analysis, therefore, calls into question policy measures that influence willpower and visceral influences.
Keywords
Self-control; Temptation; Inter-temporal choice; Pre-commitment
Journal
Journal of Economic Psychology: Volume 34
Status | Published |
---|---|
Funders | Swedish Research Council |
Publication date | 28/02/2013 |
Publication date online | 27/11/2012 |
Date accepted by journal | 17/11/2012 |
URL | |
Publisher | Elsevier BV |
ISSN | 0167-4870 |