我要吃瓜

Citation

Pearson AG, Alexander L, Witard OC, Coughlin TE, Tipton KD & Walshe IH (2021) A hypoenergetic diet with decreased protein intake does not reduce lean body mass in trained females. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 121 (3), pp. 771-781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04555-7

Abstract
Purpose Increasing protein intake during energy restriction (ER) attenuates lean body mass (LBM) loss in trained males. However, whether this relationship exists in trained females is unknown. This study examined the impact of higher compared to lower protein intakes (35% versus 15% of energy intake) on body composition in trained females during 2 weeks of severe ER. Methods Eighteen well-trained females completed a 1-week energy balanced diet (HD100), followed by a 2-week hypoenergetic (40% ER) diet (HD60). During HD60, participants consumed either a high protein (HP; 35% protein, 15% fat) or lower protein (CON; 15% protein, 35% fat) diet. Body composition, peak power, leg strength, sprint time, and anaerobic endurance were assessed at baseline, pre-HD60, and post-HD60. Results Absolute protein intake was reduced during HD60 in the CON group (from 1.6 to 0.9 g·d·kgBM?1) and maintained in the HP group (~?1.7 g·d·kgBM?1). CON and HP groups decreased body mass equally during HD60 (? 1.0?±?1.1 kg; p?=?0.026 and ? 1.1?±?0.7 kg; p?=?0.002, respectively) and maintained LBM. There were no interactions between time point and dietary condition on exercise performance. Conclusion The preservation of LBM during HD60, irrespective of whether absolute protein intake is maintained or reduced, contrasts with findings in trained males. In trained females, the relationship between absolute protein intake and LBM change during ER warrants further investigation. Future recommendations for protein intake during ER should be expressed relative to body mass, not total energy intake, in trained females.

Keywords
Energy restriction; Weight loss; Body composition; Diet composition

Journal
European Journal of Applied Physiology: Volume 121, Issue 3

• Published version