我要吃瓜

Article

The Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare Intervention for Detection of Recurrent and Second Primary Melanoma in Survivors of Melanoma: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Details

Citation

Murchie P, Constable L, Hall S, Brant W, Allan J, Johnston M, Masthoff J, Lee A, Treweek S, Ayansina D, Proby C, Rahman K, Walter F, Burrows N, Durrani A & Maclennan G (2022) The Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare Intervention for Detection of Recurrent and Second Primary Melanoma in Survivors of Melanoma: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR cancer, 8 (3). https://doi.org/10.2196/37539

Abstract
Background: Melanoma is common with increasing incidence. Guidelines recommend monthly total skin self-examinations (TSSEs) by survivors to detect recurrent and new primary melanomas. TSSE is underperformed despite evidence of benefit. Objective: This study compares the effect on psychological well-being and TSSE practice of a self-directed digital intervention with treatment as usual in patients treated for a first stage 0 to IIC primary cutaneous melanoma within the preceding 60 months. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 2 UK National Health Service hospitals (Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Grampian, and Addenbrooke’s, Cambridge). Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with a first 0 to IIC primary cutaneous melanoma were randomized to receive Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA), a tablet-based intervention prompting and supporting TSSE in survivors of melanoma, or to usual care. The hypothesis was that ASICA would increase TSSE practice in users affected by melanoma and compared with controls without affecting psychological well-being. The main primary outcomes were melanoma worry (Melanoma Worry Scale), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) as well as secondary outcomes collected using postal questionnaires 3, 6, and 12 months following randomization. Results: A total of 240 recruits were randomized (1:1) into the ASICA (n=121, 50.4%) or control (n=119, 49.6%) groups. There were no significant differences between groups for melanoma worry at 12 months (mean difference: 0.12, 95% CI ?0.6 to 0.84; P=.74), 3 months (0.23, 95% CI ?0.31 to 0.78; P=.40), or 6 months (?0.1, 95% CI ?0.7 to 0.51; P=.76). The ASICA group had lower anxiety scores at 12 months (?0.54, 95% CI ?1.31 to 0.230; P=.17), 3 months (?0.13, 95% CI ?0.79 to 0.54; P=.71), and significantly at 6 months (?1.00, 95% CI ?1.74 to ?0.26; P=.009). Depression scores were similar, being lower at 12 months (?0.44, 95% CI ?1.11 to 0.23; P=.20) and 3 months (?0.24, 95% CI ?0.84 to 0.35; P=.42) but only significantly lower at 6 months (?0.77, 95% CI ?1.41 to ?0.12; P=.02). The ASICA group had significantly higher quality of life scores at 12 months (0.044, 95% CI 0.003-0.085; P=.04) and 6 months (0.070, 95% CI 0.032-0.107; P<.001) and nonsignificantly at 3 months (0.024, 95% CI ?0.006 to 0.054; P=.11). ASICA users reported significantly more regular (>5) TSSEs during the study year and significantly higher levels of self-efficacy in conducting TSSE. They also reported significantly higher levels of planning and intention to perform TSSE in the future. Conclusions: Using ASICA for 12 months does not increase melanoma worry, can reduce anxiety and depression, and may improve quality of life. ASICA has the potential to improve the well-being and vigilance of survivors of melanoma and enable the benefits of regular TSSE.

Keywords
primary care; melanoma; cancer; randomized controlled trial; survivorship; self-directed care; e-health; Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare; ASICA; well-being; quality of life; mobile phone

Journal
JMIR cancer: Volume 8, Issue 3

StatusPublished
Funders
Publication date08/09/2022
Publication date online08/09/2022
Date accepted by journal11/07/2022
URL
PublisherJMIR Publications Inc.
eISSN2369-1999

People (1)

Professor Julia Allan

Professor Julia Allan

Professor in Psychology, Psychology

Files (1)