我要吃瓜

Article

Model comparison in ANOVA

Details

Citation

Rouder J, Engelhardt C, McCabe S & Morey R (2016) Model comparison in ANOVA. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23 (6), pp. 1779-1786. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1026-5

Abstract
Analysis of variance (ANOVA), the workhorse analysis of experimental designs, consists of F-tests of main effects and interactions. Yet, testing, including traditional ANOVA, has been recently critiqued on a number of theoretical and practical grounds. In light of these critiques, model comparison and model selection serve as an attractive alternative. Model comparison differs from testing in that one can support a null or nested model vis-a-vis a more general alternative by penalizing more flexible models. We argue this ability to support more simple models allows for more nuanced theoretical conclusions than provided by traditional ANOVA F-tests. We provide a model comparison strategy and show how ANOVA models may be reparameterized to better address substantive questions in data analysis.

Keywords
ANOVA; Statistical models; Interactions; Model comparison; Order-restricted inference

Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review: Volume 23, Issue 6

StatusPublished
Publication date31/12/2016
Publication date online11/04/2016
Date accepted by journal03/03/2016
URL
PublisherSpringer
ISSN1069-9384
eISSN1531-5320