我要吃瓜

Citation

Bergmann A, Colombo S & Hanley N (2008) Rural versus Urban Preferences for Renewable Energy Developments. Ecological Economics, 65 (3), pp. 616-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.011

Abstract
Development of renewable energy resources, such as wind farms and hydro-electric schemes, are being promoted as a new method of expanding and diversifying employment in rural areas. However, such energy projects are associated with a range of environmental impacts which might be detrimental to other economic activities, such as those based on nature tourism. The authors use a Choice Experiment to quantify peoples' preferences over environmental and employment impacts that may result from the deployment of renewable energy projects in rural areas of Scotland, focussing in particular on any differences between the preferences of urban and rural dwellers, and on heterogeneity within these groups. Rural and urban households are shown to have different welfare gains which are dependent on the type of renewable energy technology and on the scale of project under consideration

Keywords
activities; Alternative Energy Sources Q420; AREAS; choice; choice experiment; Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis D120; Development; difference; Economic; Employment; ENERGY; Energy: Government Policy Q480; environmental impact; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; EUROPE; experiment; HETEROGENEITY; HOUSEHOLDS; IMPACT; IMPACTS; method; NUMBER; other; PEOPLE; preference; Preferences; RANGE; REGION; resources; rural; Rural Areas; SCALE; Scotland; Stirling; Technology; TOURISM; Urban,Rural,and Regional Economics: Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population; Neighborhood Characteristics R230; welfare

Journal
Ecological Economics: Volume 65, Issue 3